Cover |
| Title
Page |
| Notice of
Availability |
| |
| 1.
Introduction |
1.1. Purpose
1.2. Organization of Final EIR
1.3. Decision Making Process |
| |
| 2.
Summary of Public Review Process |
2.1. Public Involvement Milestones
2.2. EIR Information and Repository Sites
2.3. Public Review Period
2.4. Informational Workshops and Public Participation Hearings
|
| |
| 3.
Responses to Comments |
Table 3-1. Commenters and Comment Set Numbers
General Responses:
GR-1 Proposed Project Relationship to OMPPA Project
GR-2 Electric and Magnetic Field (EMF) and Health Effects
GR-3 Undergrounding of Transmission Lines
GR-4 Property Values
GR-5 Aesthetic Impacts of the Proposed Project |
| |
|
Public
Agencies, Part 1 of 2
Comment Set A - Padre Dam Municipal Water District
Comment Set B - Instituto de Informatica
Comment Set C - San Diego County Water Authority
Comment Set D - Helix Water District
Comment Set E - City of Santee
|
| |
Public
Agencies, Part 2 of 2
Comment Set F - Caltrans
Comment Set G - San Diego County Board of Supervisors
Comment Set H - Federal Aviation Administration
Comment Set I - U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and California
Department of Fish & Game
|
| |
Community
Groups, Nonprofit Organizations, and Private Companies
Comment Set CC1 - Barona Band of Mission Indians
Comment Set CC2 - San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce
Comment Set CC3 - Border Generation Group
Comment Set CC4 - Barratt American, Inc. |
| |
Public
Participation Hearings, May 10, 2004
Comment Set PPH1 - Santee City Hall, 4:00 p.m.
Comment Set PPH2 - Santee City Hall, 7:00 p.m. |
| |
Public
Participation Hearings, May 11, 2004
Comment Set PPH3 - Spring Valley Library, 4:00 p.m.
Comment Set PPH4 - El Cajon Community Center, 7:00 p.m. |
| |
Private
Individuals, Part 1 of 2
Comment Set 1 - Dalour Younan
Comment Set 2 - John Mood
Comment Set 3 - Bob Meijer
Comment Set 4 - Michael Bortoli
Comment Set 5 - Lonna & Mike Perry
Comment Set 6 - Mary E. England
Comment Set 7 - Jeff Bruhn
Comment Set 8 - Gregg Guenther & Ellen Holaway - Santee Citizens
for Safe Power
Comment Set 9 - Arlen and Elaine Watt
Comment Set 10 - J. Michael Lowell |
| |
|
Private
Individuals, Part 2 of 2
Comment Set 11 - Linda Kirk
Comment Set 12 - Ruth G. Jones
Comment Set 13 - Katherine L. Marsh
Comment Set 14 - Kevin Marsh
Comment Set 15 - Bob & Gail Crawford
|
| |
|
The Applicant (San Diego Gas & Electric Company)
Comment Set
SD, Part 1 of 5
Comment Set SD,
Part 2 of 5
Comment Set SD,
Part 3 of 5
Comment Set SD,
Part 4 of 5
Comment
Set SD, Part 5 of 5 (Responses)
|
| |
| 4.
Revisions to the Draft EIR |
| Executive Summary |
| A. Introduction/Overview |
| B. Description of Proposed Project |
| C. Alternatives |
| D.2. Air Quality |
| D.3. Biological Resources |
| D.4. Cultural Resources |
| D.5. Geology, Soils, and Paleontology |
| D.6. Hydrology and Water Quality |
| D.7. Land Use and Recreation |
| D.8. Noise and Vibration |
| D.9. Public Health and Safety |
| D.10. Public Services and Utilities |
| D.12. Transportation and Traffic |
| D.13. Visual Resources |
| |
Visual Resources, Figure D.13-32. KOP 6 – Jamacha
Elementary School, Proposed Project, Simulated View to North, revised
|
| E. Comparison of Alternatives |
| F. Other CEQA Considerations |
| G. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting |
| I. Report Preparation |
| Appendix 2. Alternatives Screening Report |
| Appendix 3. Biological Resources Technical
Report |
| |
|
