Welcome to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) website
for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review of the
proposed Sunrise Powerlink Transmission Line Project. Applications
for this project were submitted to the CPUC on December 14,
2005 (A.05-12-014) and August 4, 2006 (A.06-08-010). This site
provides access to public documents and information relevant to
the CEQA and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review processes.
Background
SDG&E has filed an application with the CPUC to construct the
Sunrise Powerlink Project (SRPL). The CPUC is the CEQA lead agency
and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is the lead agency
under NEPA. This project was approved by the California Independent
System Operator on August 3, 2006. The Proponent's Environmental
Assessment was filed with the CPUC on August 4, 2006 and is
available on SDG&E's
project website.
The CPUC maintains other web pages for documents related to its
proceeding on the SRPL, where it makes available documents filed
by parties to that proceeding. The web page for Application A.06-08-010
incorporates the earlier filing, and lists documents and rulings
filed in the proceedings. The CPUC also maintains a page of general
information on the SRPL project.
The SRPL Project, as proposed by SDG&E, includes a new, approximately
90-mile, 500 kV line from Imperial Valley Substation (in Imperial
County, near the City of El Centro) to a new Central East Substation
(in central San Diego County, south of the intersection of County
Highways S22 and S2). The 500 kV portion would
approximately follow the eastern boundary of BLM lands west of El
Centro and SR 78, and would pass through Anza-Borrego Desert
State Park.
The SRPL Project also proposes approximately 60 miles of 230 kV transmission
lines from the new Central East Substation to SDG&E's existing
Peñasquitos Substation (in the City of San Diego). SDG&E
proposes to construct two segments underground (one segment south
of Ramona and another in the community of Ranchos Peñasquitos,
San Diego). Figure 1 shows
an overview of the proposed project route.
Decisions on EIR/EIS Alternatives
March 2007 Notice. The CPUC and BLM held a second scoping
period during January and February 2007 in order to hear input on
alternatives to the Sunrise Powerlink Project. The comment period
ended on February 24, 2007, and a second Scoping Report is now being
prepared to document all comments received. The CPUC/BLM
Notice Regarding Conclusions on EIR/EIS Alternatives to the Proposed
Sunrise Powerlink Project is now available. This Notice, with
seven maps, was mailed to everyone on the project mailing list during
the week of March 19, 2007. The maps referenced in the Notice
may be viewed through the links presented below under "Documents
Available."
A second Scoping Report has been
prepared, including copies of all comment letters and transcripts
of oral comments made at the February 5-9, 2007 Public
Meetings on Alternatives. This report is included in the document
list below and copies have been placed in local document
repository sites.
May 2007 Notice. The conclusions presented in the March
Notice referenced above were based on the feedback received from
the public and agencies, along with research conducted by the EIR/EIS
team. Following the publication of that Notice, additional input
was received from the Cleveland National Forest (Forest), including
Forest's request that an alternative be fully analyzed in the EIR/EIS
that would not require an amendment to the Forest's 2005 Land Management
Plan. As a result, portions of the Route D Alternative that
were previously considered and eliminated have been combined with
new route segments, and will be analyzed in the EIR/EIS. The CPUC/BLM
Notice Regarding an Additional EIR/EIS Alternative to the Proposed
Sunrise Powerlink Project was mailed in mid-May to announce
this change.
September/October 2006 Scoping
On August 31, 2006, the BLM published its Notice
of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement in the
Federal Register (Volume 71, No. 169, page 51848). On
September 15, 2006, the CPUC issued a Notice
of Preparation/Notice of Public Scoping Meetings for an Environmental
Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement. In early October 2006,
the CPUC and BLM held a series of seven public scoping meetings
in Imperial and San Diego Counties to take public comment on the
scope and content of the environmental document. The scoping comment
period ended on October 20, 2006.
A Scoping Report (Part 1) was prepared
and was sent to all repositories on November 29, 2006; see the list
of available documents below. The Scoping Report includes a copy
of every letter submitted, as well as transcripts of the public
scoping meetings and summaries of issues raised during scoping.
Documents Available
The following documents are available
at 28 libraries and offices in the
project area.
CPUC/BLM Notice Regarding
an Additional EIR/EIS Alternative to the Proposed Sunrise Powerlink
Project (May 16, 2007)
Scoping Report, Part 2
(April 2, 2007)
Notice Regarding
Conclusions on EIR/EIS Alternatives to the Proposed Sunrise Powerlink
Project (March 16, 2007)
Figure
1. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives
Figure 2.
Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives
Figure 3. Central
Link Alternatives
Figure 4.
Inland Valley Link Alternatives
Figure
5. Coastal Link Alternatives Retained
Figure
6. Coastal Link Alternatives Eliminated
Figure
7. Southwest Powerlink Alternatives
Notice of Second
Round of Scoping Meetings on Alternatives to the Proposed Sunrise
Powerlink Project (January 22, 2007)
Figure 1.
Sunrise Powerlink Project Overview
Figure 2. Imperial Valley
Link Alternatives
Figure 3. Anza-Borrego Link
Alternatives
Figure 4. Central Link Alternatives
Figure 5. Inland Valley Link
Alternatives
Figure 6. Coastal Link Alternatives
Retained
Figure 7. Coastal Link Alternatives
Eliminated
Figure 8. Southwest Powerlink
Alternatives
Figure 9. Non-Wires Alternatives
Figure 10. System Alternatives
Scoping Report, Part 1
(November 29, 2006)
Notice of Preparation
(NOP) (September 15, 2006)
Figure 1.
Proposed Project Overview
Figure 2. Imperial Valley
Link
Figure 3. Anza-Borrego Link
Figure 4A. Central Link
Figure 4B. Proposed Central
East Substation
Figure 5A. Inland Valley
Link
Figure 5B. Detail of Ramona
Area
Figure 6A. Coastal Link
Figure 6B. Rancho Peñasquitos
Detail
Figure 7. SDG&E Alternatives
Fully Evaluated and Carried Forward in PEA
Figure 8. SDG&E Alternatives
Considered and Eliminated
Notice of Intent
(August 31, 2006)
SDG&E's
Application and Proponent's Environmental Assessment (August 4,
2006).
Data Requests
The EIR/EIS Team will submit Data Requests to SDG&E when it
needs specific information to support EIR/EIS preparation. These
requests will be made available here at the time they are issued.
Data requests submitted to SDG&E to date are provided below.
Responses to these data requests can be found at SDG&E's
website.
Data Request No. 1 (September
27, 2006)
Data Request No. 2 (November 15,
2006)
Data Request No. 3 (November 21,
2006)
Data Request No. 4 (December 6,
2006)
Data Request No. 5 (January 8,
2007)
Data Request No. 6 (January 26,
2007)
Data Request No. 7 (February 1,
2007)
For Additional Information
To request additional information or to be added to the mailing
list, please contact us by email, fax, or phone, as follows:
The CPUC's Project Manager is:
Billie Blanchard, CPUC Project Manager
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco CA 94102
Tel. (415) 703-2068
Fax (415) 703-2200
Email: bcb@cpuc.ca.gov
|