|
|
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
|
Welcome to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) website for the environmental review for the proposed construction of the San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) East County (ECO) Substation Project located in southeastern San Diego County, California. SDG&E submitted an application to the CPUC on August 10, 2009 (Application A.09-08-003). The proposed project is subject to review under both the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This site provides access to public documents and information relevant to the CEQA and NEPA review processes. Project Meetings and Notice of Extension of Public Review Comment PeriodPublic Informational Meetings on Draft EIR/EISTo help understand the proposed project and explain how the public can participate in the CPUC’s and Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) decision-making process, CPUC and BLM held two public informational meetings, including one at the Jacumba Highland Center located at 44681 Old Highway 80, Jacuma, California 91934 on January 26, 2011, at 7:00 p.m., and another at the Boulevard Volunteer Fire Department located at 39223 Highway 94, Boulevard, California 91905 on February 2, 2011, at 7:00 p.m. The public informational meeting presentation is available here. A written comment form is available here. Notice of Extension of Public Review Comment PeriodThe public review comment period of the Draft EIR/EIS has been extended from February 16, 2011, to March 4, 2011. The public notice is available here. Comments must be received or postmarked by March 4, 2011. Please send comments to: c/o Dudek 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Or email to either: Email: ecosub@dudek.com (CPUC project email) or catulewind@blm.gov (BLM project email) To find out how you can participate in the Permit to Construct Proceeding,
please register your interest by contacting the public advisor office: Administrative Law Judge's Prehearing ConferenceThe Administrative Law Judge will hold a Prehearing Conference for the ECO Substation Project on Friday, February 18, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. in the San Diego State Office Building, 6th floor, Courtroom 1-6003, 1350 Front Street, San Diego, California. The notice is available here. BackgroundSDG&E filed an application for a Permit to Construct the ECO Substation Project with the CPUC and an application for a Right-of-Way (ROW) Grant from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The proposed ECO Substation Project will cross approximately 1.5 miles of land managed by BLM. The CPUC and the BLM have developed and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (completed on December 14, 2009) that will direct the preparation of a joint Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/ Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the ECO Substation Project. The CPUC, as the lead agency under California law, and the BLM, as the federal lead agency, will prepare a Draft and Final EIR/EIS to comply with CEQA and NEPA. The CPUC will evaluate the environmental impacts of the proposed ECO Substation Project in accordance with CEQA and the BLM will evaluate the project in accordance with NEPA. The ECO Substation Project, as proposed by SDG&E, includes the following major components:
The proposed ECO Substation Project would provide an interconnection hub for renewable generation along SDG&E´s existing SWPL 500 kV transmission line. In addition to accommodating the region´s planned renewable generation, the project would also provide a second source for the southeastern 138 kV transmission system that avoids the vulnerability of common structure outages, which would increase the reliability of electrical service for Boulevard, Jacumba, and surrounding communities. The ECO Substation Project would provide interconnection capability at three voltage levels, which would provide renewable generators the option to connect at a voltage level that is appropriately sized for their project. The primary component of the project, the ECO Substation, is situated approximately 0.5 mile north of the United States (U.S.)–Mexico border and 0.5 mile west of the Imperial County border. In addition to the ECO Substation Project, the CPUC and BLM have determined that the Tule Wind Project, as proposed by Pacific Wind Development (a subsidiary of Iberdrola Renewables, Inc.), and the Energia Sierra Juarez Generator-Tie (ESJ Gen-Tie) Project, as proposed by Energia Sierra Juarez U.S. Transmission, LLC, are so closely related to the proposed ECO Substation Project as to be considered “connected actions” under NEPA and “whole of the action” under CEQA. Current plans for the Tule Wind Project would tie this project into the proposed Boulevard Substation rebuild component of the ECO Substation Project. As proposed, the ESJ Gen-Tie Project would connect to the ECO Substation 500 kV or 230/138 kV yards component of the ECO Substation Project. These three projects are collectively referred to as the Proposed PROJECT. In addition, the proposed Invenergy and SDG&E Campo Wind Project, as well as the Manzanita Wind Project and Jordan Wind Project, which would connect to the Boulevard Substation Rebuild, are viewed as reasonably foreseeable. The CPUC and BLM have determined that these three wind energy projects are sufficiently developed to analyze impacts where feasible. Therefore, for purposes of this EIR/EIS, the Campo, Manzanita, and Jordan wind energy projects will be qualitatively evaluated at a programmatic level because sufficient project-level information has yet to be developed. The proposed Campo, Manzanita, and Jordan wind energy projects will still require project-specific environmental review and evaluation under all applicable environmental regulations once sufficient project-level information is developed. By including these nascent wind projects as components of the Proposed PROJECT, it allows the lead agencies to further consider broad impacts, mitigation, and consequences of the ECO Substation Project specifically, and the Proposed PROJECT as a whole. The project location map depicts the location of the ECO Substation, Tule Wind, and ESJ projects, as well as the location of the Campo, Manzanita, and Jordan wind energy projects. This map also depicts ESJ Wind Project components in northern Baja California, Mexico, as potential biological, visual resource, and fire impacts within the U.S. that could be related to or caused by this project are addressed in the ECO Substation, Tule Wind, and ESJ Gen-Tie Projects EIR/EIS. These projects are analyzed within the same environmental document and are described below. Tule Wind Project The proposed Tule Wind Project, consisting of up to 134 wind turbines in the 1.5 to 3.0–megawatt (MW) range generating up to 200 MW of electricity, would be located in the McCain Valley in southeastern San Diego County, California. In addition to wind turbines and associated generator step-up transformers, the Tule Wind MW Project would include the following components:
For public safety, permanent fences would be erected around the collector substation, meteorological towers, O&M facility, and the equipment storage area. This project requires a Record of Decision from BLM and a Major Use Permit from the County of San Diego. The County of San Diego will use the EIR/EIS to issue the Major Use Permit for its compliance with CEQA. ESJ Gen-Tie Project As proposed by Energia Sierra Juarez U.S. Transmission, LLC, the ESJ Gen-Tie Project would have the capacity to import up to 1,250 MW of renewable energy generated in northern Baja California, Mexico, to the existing SWPL Transmission Line in southeastern San Diego County, California. The selected route would interconnect with the proposed ECO Substation and would be constructed on three to five 150-foot lattice towers or 170-foot steel monopoles, extending south from the point of interconnection for about 0.5 mile to the U.S.-Mexico international border. Only renewable energy would be transmitted via the gen-tie line. The EIR/EIS will address the gen-tie line including any potential impacts to the U.S. associated with wind turbines constructed in Mexico. This project requires a Presidential Permit (PP-334) from the United States Department of Energy and a Major Use Permit from the County of San Diego. The County of San Diego will use the EIR/EIS to issue the Major Use Permit for its compliance with CEQA. Campo Wind Project SDG&E proposes to construct and operate approximately 106 turbines capable of generating 160 MW of electricity on its reservation lands. The project would be located south of the Tule Wind Project and west of the Boulevard Substation on the Campo Indian Reservation. Construction of the project is expected to occur over a single phase. Turbines (approximately 450 feet tall from ground to tip of the fully extended turbine blade) would be located on available ridgelines on the reservation. In addition to the 160 MW of generating capacity proposed for this project, the Campo Tribe has requested that an additional 140 MW of generation be analyzed in the Bureau of Indian Affairs’ NEPA review of the project for future development purposes. The proposed Invenergy and SDG&E Campo Wind Project would connect with the Boulevard Substation Rebuild component of the ECO Substation Project. Manzanita Wind Project The Manzanita Tribe proposes a project capable of generating up to 57.5 MW, which could include up to 25 wind turbines depending on the turbine size selected. These wind turbines are proposed to be located on the same ridgeline as the existing Kumeyaay Wind facility. Turbines are proposed to be approximately 414 feet tall from ground to tip of the turbine blade fully extended. The Manzanita Wind Project would connect with the Boulevard Substation Rebuild component of the ECO Substation Project. It is expected that the Campo and Manzanita wind energy projects would develop a switchyard for both facilities on non-tribal lands and a new 138 kV transmission line would be constructed along the existing ROW of the 69 kV transmission corridor that currently connects to the existing Boulevard Substation. The new 138 kV transmission line would interconnect with the proposed Boulevard Substation Rebuild component of the ECO Substation Project. Jordan Wind Project The developers of the Jordan Wind Project have completed a preliminary wind energy assessment to construct and operate 40 2.3 MW turbines (total generating capacity of 92 MW) west of Boulevard in unincorporated San Diego County. The towers of the proposed wind turbines would be approximately 260 feet tall (height from ground to tip of fully extended blade would be approximately 430 feet). As proposed, construction of the project would occur between February and October 2013, and commercial operations are scheduled to begin in November 2013. The preferred point of interconnection for the Jordan Wind Project is the Boulevard Substation Rebuild component of the ECO Substation Project. Application and Proponent's Environmental Assessment (PEA)The proponent's environmental assessment (PEA) for the ECO Substation Project was submitted August 10, 2009, and is available here. Data RequestsThe EIR/EIS team has submitted data requests to the applicants and other entities for specific information during preparation of the EIR/EIS. Those requests and the applicants’ responses are available online for the ECO Substation Project, Tule Wind Project, and ESJ Gen-Tie Project. Other data requests are available here. Other Documents AvailableTule Wind Project: The Applicant’s Environmental Document prepared by Iberdrola Renewables, Inc. for the Tule Wind Project is available here. A memorandum of how the EIR/EIS team utilized this document is provided here. Technical studies prepared for the ECO Substation, Tule Wind, and ESJ Gen-Tie projects and used in preparation of the EIR/EIS are also available online. The Scoping Report is available here (March 23, 2010). Due to an oversight, letters received from the Defenders of Wildlife and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency were not published in the March 2010 Scoping Report. These letters, received on January 28 and February 3, 2010, are published in their entirety in Appendix G as Volume 3 (addendum). Public Scoping Meeting presentation is available here. The Public Notice is available here. The Notice of Preparation (NOP) is available (here). (Official public review period: December 28, 2009 to February 10, 2010.) The Notice of Intent (NOI) is available (here). (Official public review period: December 29, 2009 to February 12, 2010.) The PEA completeness review/deficiency letter was sent by the CPUC on September 4, 2009, and can be viewed here. An addendum to the completeness review was sent to SDG&E on September 9, 2009 and can be viewed here. SDG&E’s response to this addendum (September 18, 2009) can be viewed here. Application deemed complete on October 2, 2009. Letter can be viewed here. SDG&E’s response to the completeness review (October 20, 2009) is here. Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)The Draft EIR/EIS is available here (December 24, 2010). The Draft EIR/EIS was released for public review on December 24, 2010, for a 54-day public review period ending February 16, 2011. To ensure that comments will be considered, the CPUC must receive written comments on the Draft EIR/EIS by the close of the public review period (February 16, 2011). Written comments on the Joint DEIR/DEIS can be submitted via:
Final EIR/EIS The public review and comment period for the Draft EIR/EIS ended on March 4, 2011. A copy of comment letters received during public review can be found here. The Final EIR/EIS will be published here, when available. Commission DecisionThe commission´s decision will be posted here when available. Construction Progress and Mitigation MonitoringReports issued by the CPUC, reports on construction progress, and reports issued as part of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will be published here, when available. For Additional InformationThe CPUC, through its environmental review team, is conducting an environmental review of this project. To request additional information or to be added to the mailing list, please contact us by email, fax, or phone as follows:
The CPUC's project manager is:Amy Baker , CPUC Project Manager The BLM's project manager is:Thomas Zale, BLM Project Manager
|
Related Links: |
