INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
1. |
Project Title: |
PG&E Northern Geysers Area Reinforcement Project (Application Number 98-06-039) |
2. |
Lead Agency Name and Address: |
California Public Utilities Commission |
3. |
Contact Person and Phone Number: |
Stephen Rutledge, Regulatory Analyst |
4. |
Project Location: |
Eagle Rock Substation is located in Northern Sonoma County within the Known Geysers Resource Area approximately 11 miles south of Clear Lake; Fulton Substation is located approximately 2 miles north of the City of Santa Rosa at the intersection of Highway 101 and River Road (see Figure 1) |
5. |
Project Sponsor’s Name and Address: |
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Attn: John Mintz (415) 973-5779 |
6. |
General Plan |
Geysers Site : Resources andRural Development Fulton Site: Public/Quasi Public |
7. |
Zoning: |
Geysers Site : Resources and Rural DevelopmentFulton Site: Public Facility |
8. |
Description of Project: |
Purpose and Need
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) is proposing to reinforce the Northern Geysers Power Line System by making additions to existing facilities at the northern and southern ends of the existing Geysers Unit 11-Fulton transmission line. The proposed facilities would be installed at the Geysers and Fulton sites, both located in Sonoma County, California. The purpose of the project is to meet the rising demand for electricity in Colusa, Lake, Mendocino and northern Sonoma counties, to which PG&E provides power.
PG&E currently operates two power line systems that are served by geothermal power generated at The Geysers: the Northern Geysers 115/60kV Power Line System and a 230kV transmission system. The Northern Geysers Power Line System serves customers in Colusa, Lake, Mendocino and northern Sonoma counties. The 230kV transmission line provides electric service in southern Sonoma and Napa counties.
Electricity demand in Colusa, Lake, Mendocino and especially, northern Sonoma counties has increased over the past several years (PG&E, 1998). PG&E has stated that the expected electrical load growth is the primary reason for reinforcement of the Northern Geysers Power Line System. Currently, the system is served by six geothermal plants (including PG&E’s Geysers Units 5, 6, 7 and 8) and the Eagle Rock Substation. A fifth unit (Geysers Unit 11) and other units are currently connected to the 230kV system. Power flow studies simulating area peak load conditions in 1998 indicate that transformer bank capacity overload and unacceptable low voltages would occur on the 115kV/60kV power line if an outage were to occur at Geysers Units 5 and 6 or if Geysers Unit 7 were temporarily or permanently taken out of service. Under such conditions, transformer and power line overloads could interrupt electrical service for customers in Colusa, Lake, Mendocino and northern Sonoma counties.
Project Description
Location. PG&E’s proposed reinforcement of the Northern Geysers Power Line System would consist of new power lines at two existing facilities, located at the Geysers and Fulton Substation sites, and circuit breaker structures at the Geysers Eagle Rock Substation.
The Geysers site is located in the northern portion of the Known Geysers Resource Area (KGRA), approximately twelve miles south of Clear Lake (see Figure 1). The site includes Geysers Unit 11 and the Eagle Rock Substation. The KGRA is a developed area in the rural Mayacamas Mountains used for heavy industry, primarily geothermal power plants. The area includes substations, transmission lines, access roads and support facilities. As topography at the Geysers site is mountainous, facilities have been constructed in flat areas of constructed cut and fill at the site. The site is in a remote location that has no public access.
The Fulton site is located adjacent to U.S. 101 approximately two miles north of Santa Rosa and roughly one-half mile east of the community of Fulton (see Figure 1). The site contains the Fulton Substation, two 230 kV transmission lines and one 115kV power line. The general site vicinity is primarily defined as rural or suburban, with agricultural uses, disturbed grasslands and nearby vineyards.
Proposed Facilities. The project consists of two elements:
Geysers Site: The proposed 3,300-foot 115 kV double circuit power line would be constructed from the existing transmission tower south of Geysers Unit 11 to the Eagle Rock Substation at the Geysers site (see Figure 2). An existing transmission cross arm on the tower would be replaced with a butterfly cross arm that ties the power line from Unit 11 to the Eagle Rock Substation. The new 115 kV power line would be carried by five new tubular steel power poles, three of which would be up to 135 feet tall and two which would be up to 85 feet tall. A fiber optic communication cable would be strung between Unit 11 and the Eagle Rock Substation on existing wooden poles. Approximately 400 feet of new graded road would be created to provide access to two of the tubular steel pole sites for their construction and maintenance.
Two 115 kV bay structures with two 115 kV line positions would be added to the easterly end of the Eagle Rock substation. The area is an open gravel-covered space located entirely within the existing substation fence. Each bay would be 35 feet high by 36 feet wide by 50 feet long and would be supported on approximately 11 concrete foundation footings which would be 18 inches by 18 inches by 5 feet deep. Each line position would contain a 115 kV circuit breaker, approximately 15 feet high by 13 feet wide by 8 feet long, and three 115 kV air disconnect switches. The line position would be mounted on a 6-foot by 6-foot concrete pad. Control wires in a plastic conduit would run between the existing control building and the proposed circuit breakers. Approximately 200 feet of the control wire would be placed in existing conduit and 100 feet would be placed in new conduit in a one foot wide by three foot deep trench.
Fulton Site: The project would include installing a new 115 kV line position at an existing 115 kV bay at the Fulton Substation. The line position would include a 115 kV circuit breaker and five 115kV air disconnect switches. The 115 kV circuit breaker would be mounted on a six foot by six foot concrete pad. Approximately 1,200 feet of 115 kV power line would be constructed to route the Geysers Unit 11-Fulton power line from the Fulton Substation to the new 115 kV line position within the substation. The line would be located entirely within the existing substation fence. The construction of the 115 kV line would require the installation of six new tubular steel poles, three of which would be 40 feet tall, and three of which would be 70 feet tall (see Figure 3).
Construction. Improvements at the Geysers site would be constructed over a 10 week period. Improvements at the Fulton site would be constructed over a period of 13 weeks. Existing roads would be used to transport materials on site. The project would involve the following construction:
All construction equipment, vehicles, personnel and staging areas would be accommodated at the existing substations. Construction is scheduled to begin March 1999 and anticipated to finish in June 1999. Construction crews would consist of a maximum of ten people. A substation crew would install the 115 kV line positions, a tower crew would install the tubular steel poles and a line crew would be responsible for stringing conductors. Additionally, a two-person road crew would be used for construction of the access roads at the Geysers site. Construction would not require crossing of any public roads or highways nor any stream crossings.
Although the Geysers Unit 11-Fulton line would be temporarily de-energized, PG&E does not expect electrical service interruptions to customers in the area during the construction (PG&E 1998).
9. |
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: |
The Geysers site is located in a remote unpopulated mountainous area within the KGRA. Surrounding uses include heavy industry, geothermal plants, substations, transmission lines, access roads and support facilities.
The Fulton site is surrounded by agricultural uses, vineyards, residential and commercial uses (see Figure 1). The site is bounded by Highway 101 to the northeast, River Road to the south and vineyards to the west and north. A residential area, consisting of approximately 12 homes, is located east of Highway 101, approximately 500 to 1,500 feet from the northeast corner of the site. Most of the homes are greater than 1,000 feet away from the site. A commercial bed-and-breakfast establishment is located southeast of the site, at the intersection of River Road and Barnes Road. A few commercial buildings are located west of the substation on River Road.
10. |
Other public agencies whose approval is required: (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) |
Pursuant to State Law, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is the permitting authority for the project.
A grading permit will be required from Sonoma County for the 400 feet of access roads.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Land Use and Planning |
Transportation/Circulation |
Public Services |
Population and Housing |
Biological Resources |
Utilities and Service Systems |
X |
Geological Problems |
Energy and Mineral Resources |
Aesthetics |
Water |
Hazards |
Cultural Resources |
Air Quality |
Noise |
Recreation |
Mandatory Findings of Significance |
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the |
||
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. |
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A |
||
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. |
X |
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, |
||
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. |
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the |
||
effects that remain to be addressed. |
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. |
||
Natalie Walsh, Program Manager Date
Analysis Branch
Energy Division
California Public Utilities Commission
TOP
Forward to Next Section (Land Use and Planning) |
Back to North Geysers Area Reinforcement Project Page | CPUC Environmental Page | CPUC Home Page |