State Seal Electric Industry
Daily InformationIndustry LinksLegal Documents
ElectricEnvironmentGasSafetyTelcoTransportationWater
go_searchsite.gif (1592 bytes)


Questions?  Comments?  Contact Us!
Site Tips or "How Do I.....?"Home


Access for People with Disabilities Consumer Info
Complaint Form
About CPUC
What's New on the CPUC Site
News Room
Phone ListingInfo for Consultants
Job Opportunities

 

Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) Letter Requesting Reply Comments on the QFRRL

October 22, 1998

VIA HAND DELIVERY

The Honorable Janet A. Econome
Administrative Law Judge
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102

Re: R.94-04-031/I.94-04-032

Dear Judge Econome:

This letter confirms our conversation of yesterday in which you kindly granted all parties the opportunity to file Reply Comments on the Proposed Decision concerning the QFRRL process in the above-referenced proceeding up to and including October 29, 1998.  In our conversation, you stated that you would issue an ALJ Ruling concerning the filing of Reply Comments early next week.  Thank you for your assistance with this matter.

Sincerely,

 

Andrew Ulmer
Attorney for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates

AU:jmc

cc: Mr. Wade McCarthy (via electronic mail)
James B. Woodruff, Esq. (via facsimile)
Mr. R. Thomas Beach (via facsimile)
Mr. David J. Gilmore (via facsimile)

Contact: Wade McCartney wsm@cpuc.ca.gov (415) 703-2167

Electric RestructuringQualifying Facility Issues Transition CostsElectric Restructuring DecisionsDirect Access & Retail Competition Rates & Tariffs Electric Service Providers Reliability


Current Issues By Industry
Current Issues in the Electric IndustryCurrent Issues in the Environmental IndustryCurrent Issues in the Gas IndustryCurrent Issues in the Telecommunication Industry