CCC PPPPP U U CCC N N EEEEE W W W SSS C C P p U U C C NN N E W W W S S C P P U U C N N N E W W W S C PPPPP U U C N N N EEE W W W W SSS C P U U C N N N E WW WW S C C P U U C C N NN E W W S S COC P UUUU CCC N N EEEEE W W SSS California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 5301 San Francisco, CA 94102 CONTACT: Armando Rendon May 22, 1996 CPUC-044 415-703-1366 (A94-12-005, A94-11-013 I91-10-029) CPUC COMPENSATES ADVOCACY GROUPS FOR INTERVENOR WORK The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) today awarded compensation to four consumer advocacy groups for their "substantial contribution" to Commission decisions in major telecommunications and energy cases. Toward Utility Rate Normalization (TURN), a statewide advocacy group, earned $147,164 as repayment for its role in Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) Co.'s 1996 general rate case and related hearings on PG&E's service response during rainstorms in early 1995. In the same case, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and the California/Nevada Community Action Association (Cal/Neva) received $18,098 and $8,474 respectively for their efforts. Moreover, the Commission found eligible for compensation the coalition of Filipino Civil Rights, Filipinos for Affirmative Action, Korean Youth and Community Center, National Council of La Raza, and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. NRDC influenced CPUC policy on market transformation programs and proposed a surcharge to recover environmental and social program costs which the Commission adopted. Cal/Neva's main contribution was in protecting low-income customers, and helping return at least half of the Direct Assistance program savings back into the program. Utility Consumers' Action Network (UCAN) earned $75,624 and TURN $10,212 for their "extensive efforts" in reaching a settement on the proposed low emission vehicle programs of San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) and Southern California Gas Company -more- (SoCalGas). Although the settlement was not adopted, the groups made good faith efforts in seeking an agreement, and, in fact, the negotiation process led to the utilities agreeing to use a bidding system for construction of new compressed natural gas refueling stations. Also, SoCal Gas withdrew both its requests for funds to develop a commercial fuel program and for recovery of costs for its natural gas vehicle programs from SDG&E. UCAN also obtained $42,447 for its active participation in negotiating an agreement with SDG&E concerning its reorganization plan for the formation of a holding company. The Public Utilities Code provides for reimbursing groups or individuals that are not associated with the CPUC or a utility who have had an impact on a CPUC decision and can show financial hardship. The CPUC then orders the utility or utilities involved to reimburse these participants. Funds are derived from customer utility rates. ###