|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$7.3 billion in senior secured securities,
tranched as follows: |
|
$1.5 billion senior secured term loan tranche
which is structured to amortize over five years |
|
remainder of senior debt is first mortgage bonds
split evenly into 5, 10 and 30 year maturities |
|
$1.5 billion in junior securities to be backed
by UBS's commitment letter pending bankruptcy court approval |
|
$1.0 billion in Senior Unsecured debt |
|
$500 million in preferred securities |
|
$1.9 billion in unfunded senior secured
revolving credit facilities |
|
$500 million 364-day senior secured tranche |
|
$500 million 3-year senior secured tranche |
|
$900 million receivables securitization tranche |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees that the CPUC will deem prudent and
recoverable all financing costs associated with the OCC/CPUC Plan |
|
Creates a $1.75 billion regulatory asset to be
amortized over 10 years |
|
Requires CPUC to establish rates sufficient to |
|
pay interest and principal on securities issued
under the OCC/CPUC plan |
|
pay prudently incurred operating and capital
costs |
|
amortize Regulatory Asset |
|
achieve and maintain investment-grade credit
ratings |
|
Expressly waives CPUC’s sovereign immunity,
allowing the Bankruptcy Court to enforce the Reorganization Agreement |
|
Reorganization Agreement will bind future
commissions |
|
|
|
|
Ruling decided, among other matters, that as a
matter of law, the Reorganization Agreement is binding and enforceable |
|
|
|
|
Ruling also decided that the OCC and CPUC had
made a prima facie case for the financial feasibility of the OCC/CPUC Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
OCC/CPUC Plan has received initial credit
assessments from S&P and Fitch |
|
S&P found that the $7.85 billion of senior
secured debt exhibits “indicia of marginal investment grade credit quality”
click here for full text of S&P letter |
|
Fitch found the creditworthiness of PG&E
under the OCC/CPUC Plan to be “in the general category of BBB” click here
for full text of Fitch letter |
|
OCC/CPUC Plan has the financial support of UBS
Warburg |
|
UBS issued a Highly-Confident letter stating
that "we are confident of our ability to arrange an aggregate of $10.7
billion of financing in the form of the Credit Facilities and the
Securities" underlying the OCC/CPUC Plan click here for full text of
UBS letter |
|
Submitted for Bankruptcy Court approval a $1.5
billion Bridge Facility proposal, in which UBS commits to backstop the
issuance of the $1.5 billion in proposed senior unsecured and preferred
stock under the OCC/CPUC Plan click here for full text of Bridge Facility
Application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcy Judge Dennis Montali will hold
separate trials to determine the confirmability of each of the competing
plans |
|
trial on the OCC/CPUC Plan substantially
complete |
|
trial on the PG&E Plan is ongoing; PG&E
amended its Plan on February 24, 2003; trial dates to continue through
Spring 2003 |
|
Judge Dennis Montali will determine whether one,
both or neither of the competing Plans is confirmable |
|
If Judge Montali determines that both plans are
confirmable, he will rule on which plan is preferable, and, therefore,
should be confirmed |
|
creditor preference is one of many factors Judge
Montali will consider in determining which plan is preferable |
|
Judge Montali will determine creditor preference
at the conclusion of the confirmation trial |
|
|
|
|
|
Other factors to be considered by the Court in
making the preference determination may include: |
|
the public policy implications of PG&E's
disaggregation's plan, |
|
the effect of PG&E's Plan on ratepayers, |
|
the possible effects of PG&E's Plan on the
environment and the structure of the energy market, |
|
the relative timing for implementation under
each plan, |
|
the stability of the reorganized debtor under
each plan, and |
|
treatment of creditors and equity security
holders under each plan |
|
|
|
|
|
Whereas the PG&E Plan contains provisions
that violate numerous California and local laws and, therefore, relies upon
the preemption of these laws, the OCC/CPUC Plan successfully reorganizes
PG&E in accordance with such laws |
|
PG&E Plan subject to ongoing litigation
regarding ability of bankruptcy law to preempt state regulatory law |
|
CPUC and California Attorney General have
committed to fight preemption to the U.S. Supreme Court, if necessary |
|
the United States, by the Department of Justice,
has filed a brief urging the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit to reject PG&E’s theory of express preemption |
|
PG&E Plan violates the sovereign immunity of
the CPUC and the State of California |
|