Re: PG&E LP report comments Oct 9
-
Subject: Re: PG&E LP report comments Oct 9
-
From: Chris King <chrisk@CellNet.com>
-
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 16:12:32 -0700
-
In-Reply-To: <771AACB10656D111A01200805F8BA0D402375F93@exchange04.comp.p ge.com>
Steve,
CellNet has reviewed and agrees with PG&E's above-captioned comments.
Please let me know if we should contact the ALJ directly.
Sincerely,
Chris King
At 05:15 PM 10/9/98 -0700, McNicoll, Susan wrote:
> <<PG&E_LP_comments_Oct_9.doc>>
>
> The attached file contains PG&E's comments on the following:
>
> REPORT ON DIRECT ACCESS LOAD PROFILING WORKSHOPS:
>
> * Technical and Methodological Issues Related to Load
>Profiling (pursuant to Assigned Commissioners Ruling Dated January 13, 1998)
> *
> * Data And Information Necessary To Assess The Effects
>Of Load Profiling, And To Determine How Load Profiling Methodologies And
>Administration Can Be Improved (pursuant to D.97-10-086, Ordering Paragraph
>10)
>
>
> Susan E. McNicoll
> PG&E
> (415) 973-7404
>
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\EUDORA\Attach\PG&E_LP_comments_Oct_9.doc"
>
.