Re: Meter Specific Services meeting - MC form
In reviewing the unresolved issues summary matrix, I noticed that the MC
form is already listed as issue L, with advance notice of new meter, 30
days too long, and why only ESP can submit under the description. I would
like to add clarification of fields as another item under description,
based on my previous email dated 12/16/98, and posted at
http://162.15.5.2:80/wk-group/dai/tariff/msg00123.htm. Having the major
items on the list like this is great - it keeps them from getting lost.
Although I cannot attend the meeting 1/12, I believe several other
manufacturers or market participants who have similar interests and
positions on these issues will be there, and I hope you will still discuss
the following issues:
1) manufacturer submittal of MC form
2) clarification of fields on MC form
3) what (if any) changes in the use of the MC form are anticipated in light
of the PSWG decision
I don't believe these fit in the categories described for the new
Implementation Feedback form. If my understanding is incorrect and I
should fill out the form, please let me know.
Thanks, and have a happy new year!
.