аЯрЁБс>ўџ ўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџRoot Entrypџџџџџџџџ РF`Ѕzё'ПTL˜т2П €WordDocumentџџџџА @„,CompObjџџџџœ€%ю@@џџџџџџџџџџџџџџ0jSummaryInformation(џџџџџџџџџџџџќ§џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ !"#$%&'()*+,-./4џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ5ўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџRoot Entrypџџџџџџџџ РF`Ѕzё'ПTL˜т2П €WordDocumentџџџџА @„,CompObjџџџџœ€%ю@@џџџџџџџџџџџџџџ0jSummaryInformation(џџџџџџџџџџџџќџџџџџџџџ§џџџ џџџџџџџџўџџџ ўџџџўџџџ0џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ123ўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџмЅhcр deЂ„,7іі f : ,f f f v † f •+1m"m"(•"•"•"•"•"•"Ї&Љ&Љ&Љ&Iђ&<.(<j)Ц+X,fˆ)  •" •"•"•"•"ˆ)с" •"– зс"с"с"•"L •" •"Ї&TL˜т2П "  •"Ї&с"Цс"Compliance with “Meter Required Threshold” Direct Access Accounts Background: The requirement for interval metering in the Direct Access (DA) environment is currently set at 50KW and above demand or an 80KW peak, however these limits are expected chanмЅhcр TeЂ„,7іі f : ,f f f v † f •+1m"m"(•"•"•"•"•"•"Ї&Љ&Љ&Љ&Iђ&<.(<j)Ц+X,fˆ)  •" •"•"•"•"ˆ)с" •"– зс"с"с"•"L •" •"Ї&РЭџ-т2П "  •"Ї&с"Цс"Compliance with “Meter Required Threshold” Direct Access Accounts Background: The requirement for interval metering in the Direct Access (DA) environment is currently set at 50KW and above demand or an 80KW peak, however these limits are expected chan98Microsoft Word for Windows 95@2~Ї@ќGА'П@У'П@Жт2ПФФўџеЭеœ.“—+,љЎ0ЬHP\dl t| „ф Њ„l! -Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshholdўџ џџџџ РFMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.6є9Вqўџр…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0Ь˜ иф 4 HT | ˆ ”  ЌДМФф-Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshhold—AA Valued Microsoft CustomerШF Normal.dot Sue Sponselge in the future. Unless interval meters are required for all Direct Access accounts, there will always be a threshold set for required interval metering. Market and business requirements could impact the criteria for this Meter Required Threshold. Problem: The “Meter Required Threshold” evaluation has been done at the start of DA, based on usage a 12 month history provided by the UDC to the pending ESP. The UDCs do not switch “ Meter Required Threshold” accounts to DA if a meter has not been installed. Since the inception of DA, some customers have increased their usage beyond the threshold and now require interval metering. All three UDCs have identified DA accounts being billed via template, that have current usage above the “Meter Required Threshold”. History: This topic has been discussed at several OCC and Rule 22 meetings. In August, the issue was assigned to the Meter Specific Working Group (MSS) for review and possible resolution. The MSS group had recommendations, however it was unclear who was responsible for the usage review. Since MDMAs were not required to calculate the demand, it appeared to move the screening responsibility back to the UDC. During the September OCC meeting, a general discussion of participants, including Steve Roscoe, determined that the ESP is clearly responsible for monitoring and complying with the “Meter Required Threshold”. The OCC participants asked that a proposal be drafted for review that reflected the ESP responsibility for this meter requirement. When a draft proposal was presented at OCC at the November meeting, many issues were raised about the long term solution to the threshold problem. These issues will be noted in the OCC minutes and the more global issue of the appropriate thresholds will be forwarded to the Load Profile workshops in early 2000. It was decided to modify the actions in the proposal to become an interim process to address the immediate non compliance of having these customers metered correctly. Interim Process - Compliance with Meter Required Thresholds in DA Accounts Who: UDCs will update the analysis of all DA accounts that have exceeded either the 50KW or 80KW spike thresholds. Each UDC will produce a list of DA accounts that may require additional metering by December 1, 1999. Lists will be sent to the appropriate ESPs with a copy to the Energy Division. ESPs are responsible for reviewing the account listings from the UDCs.determining the course of action they wish to pursuit. Possible ESP Actions: ESPs have two possible reactions to the DA accounts that have exceeded the “Meter Required Threshold”: Install an interval meter Terminate the DA relationship After the ESP determines their course of action, they will provide the UDC and Energy Division with a list of the decision for each account by January 30, 2000. The ESP will then submit a DASR to reflect the appropriate choice. DASR choices are as follows: Install Meter “Meter Required” with 3rd party MSP “Meter Required” with UDC as MSP Disconnect DASR - disconnect the ESP relationship Response to ESP DASR Decisions Install Meter If the ESP has chosen to install a meter with either a 3rd party MSP or the UDC, the meter installation DASR will be valid until May 30, 2000. If the meter is not installed by the end of this time period, the DASR will expire and customer will default to UDC bundled service. The ESP is reponsible for the customer communication for the meter install or the return to the UDC. Disconnect If the ESP has chosen to disconnect the DA customer due to the new metering requirement, the customer will return to UDC bundled service according to the existing DASR processing rules. The ESP is responsible for the communication with the customer in this situation. Time Frame The OCC established the following time frame for this Interim Meter Threshold process: December 1, 1999 - UDCs will identify all DA accounts requiring meters and notify ESPs and the Energy Division January 30, 2000 - ESPs will notify UDCs and the Energy Division of decisions related to meter installation for these threshold DA Accounts. May 30, 2000 - All DA accounts that were identified in the December 1, 1999 listings must have interval meters installed by this date or return to UDC bundled service. UDCs will notify the ESPs and Energy Division of the accounts that will be returned based on this process. OCC Interim Proposal  DATE 11/19/99  PAGE 21 ™ Єа/Ѕр=ІЇЈ Љ Њ. UDCs will send a consolidated list of all accounts, sorted by ESPFQџ ч 1 2 3 7 : ? ` d п є ТФ#$BCQŠŒакъєP`СбP\j~‚ˆ‰‘’“”š›œžЁЂЛ№ёџіјњћ ")*+XўўўњїўўўўѕўњїўѕўњўўўђээыэхухкбхЯЯЦНAEFБ›;ІPaBEFБ›;ІPauAEFЎ›;ІPaBEFЎ›;ІPaP uDPauDUc hUcU^cUJ,EFRўџ  Ќ­  ц ч 2 3 : _ ` о п ї ^x—˜œЋЯ№"§Р!B§Р!BћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!ћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фкР!ђкР!ђћР!фћР!фкР!ђЙР!фЙР!фкР!ђ ˜ў 4џџh. 8˜ў 4џhЗ!ўџџџ ўџџџ ўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ"#$CDRЯалщъїјOPРСOPefghj€Ÿ ЁЂ–™›ŸўР!фўР!фўР!ўР!фўР!фњР!фўР!фўР!фњР!фўР!фўР!ўР!фўР!фўР!фњР!фњР!фњР!фњР!фњР!фўР!фўР!фўР!фўР!фїѕўѓўўўР!фўўўўўўа$DocumentSummaryInformation8џџџџџџџџџџџџ ќџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџK@ёџNormala .@. Heading 1 №< U]ck"A@ђџЁ"Default Paragraph Font @ђ Header рР! @ Footer рР!)@Ђ Page Number, to Steve Roscoe at and 11seach ESPs will forward a consolidated copy of their action lists to Steve Roscoe at the Energy Division by the January deadline. 22 2 2 2 2wn Sue SponselPacific Gas & ElectricFXB1@MGMT@DCPP Consultant2William KlenckManfXgjky”•–—˜™š›œžŸ їюхмгЪBEFХ›;ІPaBEFС›;ІPaBEFЖ›;ІPaBEFЕ›;ІPaAEFД›;ІPaBEFД›;ІPaWЂџџџџ!џџ џџЗ Wš: Љ т WР!фР!фР!ф69X  "Ÿ зUnknown Sue SponselPacific Gas & ElectricFXB1@MGMT@DCPP Consultant2William KlenckManfred MeisterLaura L. Johns Mike White Mark DoukasMANAGER - INTERNAL AUDITING Lawrence Abel Lawrence Abel Mike White…ё*› A Valued Microsoft Customer Valerie Lewis /A Valued Microsoft Customer Valerie LewisFUAlbert D. SmullinJanet L. Redmond-Sue SponselA Valued Microsoft Customer†;#З-Sue SponselA Valued Microsoft Customer†;#И')039џ•Œ!џ•€6 : = A ч ы r v Ь д XЦA Valued Microsoft CustomerE\\GO250\SJS3$\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docA Valued Microsoft CustomerE\\GO250\SJS3$\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docA Valued Microsoft CustomerE\\GO250\SJS3$\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docA Valued Microsoft CustomerE\\GO250\SJS3$\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docA Valued Microsoft CustomerE\\GO250\SJS3$\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docA Valued Microsoft CustomerE\\GO250\SJS3$\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.doc Dan BarberGC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docA Valued Microsoft CustomerGC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docA Valued Microsoft Customge in the future. Unless interval meters are required for all Direct Access accounts, there will always be a threshold set for required interval metering. Market and business requirements could impact the criteria for this Meter Required Threshold. Problem: The “Meter Required Threshold” evaluation has been done at the start of DA, based on usage a 12 month history provided by the UDC to the pending ESP. The UDCs do not switch “ Meter Required Threshold” accounts to DA if a meter has not been installed. Since the inception of DA, some customers have increased their usage beyond the threshold and now require interval metering. All three UDCs have identified DA accounts being billed via template, that have current usage above the “Meter Required Threshold”. History: This topic has been discussed at several OCC and Rule 22 meetings. In August, the issue was assigned to the Meter Specific Working Group (MSS) for review and possible resolution. The MSS group had recommendations, however it was unclear who was responsible for the usage review. Since MDMAs were not required to calculate the demand, it appeared to move the screening responsibility back to the UDC. During the September OCC meeting, a general discussion of participants, including Steve Roscoe, determined that the ESP is clearly responsible for monitoring and complying with the “Meter Required Threshold”. The OCC participants asked that a proposal be drafted for review that reflected the ESP responsibility for this meter requirement. When a draft proposal was presented at OCC at the November meeting, many issues were raised about the long term solution to the threshold problem. These issues will be noted in the OCC minutes and the more global issue of the appropriate thresholds will be forwarded to the Load Profile workshops in early 2000. It was decided to modify the actions in the proposal to become an interim process to address the immediate non compliance of having these customers metered correctly. Interim Process - Compliance with Meter Required Thresholds in DA Accounts Who: UDCs will update the analysis of all DA accounts that have exceeded either the 50KW or 80KW spike thresholds. Each UDC will produce a list of DA accounts that may require additional metering by December 1, 1999. Lists will be sent to the appropriate ESPs with a copy to the Energy Division. ESPs are responsible for reviewing the account listings from the UDCs.determining the course of action they wish to pursuit. Possible ESP Actions: ESPs have two possible reactions to the DA accounts that have exceeded the “Meter Required Threshold”: Install an interval meter Terminate the DA relationship After the ESP determines their course of action, they will provide the UDC and Energy Division with a list of the decision for each account by January 30, 2000. The ESP will then submit a DASR to reflect the appropriate choice. DASR choices are as follows: Install Meter “Meter Required” with 3rd party MSP “Meter Required” with UDC as MSP Disconnect DASR - disconnect the ESP relationship Response to ESP DASR Decisions Install Meter If the ESP has chosen to install a meter with either a 3rd party MSP or the UDC, the meter installation DASR will be valid until May 30, 2000. If the meter is not installed by the end of this time period, the DASR will expire and customer will default to UDC bundled service. The ESP is reponsible for the customer communication for the meter install or the return to the UDC. Disconnect If the ESP has chosen to disconnect the DA customer due to the new metering requirement, the customer will return to UDC bundled service according to the existing DASR processing rules. The ESP is responsible for the communication with the customer in this situation. Time Frame The OCC established the following time frame for this Interim Meter Threshold process: December 1, 1999 - UDCs will identify all DA accounts requiring meters and notify ESPs and the Energy Division January 30, 2000 - ESPs will notify UDCs and the Energy Division of decisions related to meter installation for these threshold DA Accounts. May 30, 2000 - All DA accounts that were identified in the December 1, 1999 listings must have interval meters installed by this date or return to UDC bundled service. UDCs will notify the ESPs and Energy Division of the accounts that will be returned based on this process. OCC Interim Proposal  DATE 11/19/99  PAGE 21 ™ Єа/Ѕр=ІЇЈ Љ Њ. UDCs will send a consolidated list of all accounts, sorted by ESPFQџ ч 1 2 3 7 : ? ` d п є ТФ#$BCQŠŒакъєP`СбP\j~‚ˆ‰‘’“”š›œžЁЂЛ№ёџіјњћ ")*+XўўўњїўўўўѕўњїўѕўњўўўђээыэхухкбхЯЯЦНAEFБ›;ІPaBEFБ›;ІPauAEFЎ›;ІPaBEFЎ›;ІPaP uDPauDUc hUcU^cUJ,EFRўџ  Ќ­  ц ч 2 3 : _ ` о п ї ^x—˜œЋЯ№"§Р!B§Р!BћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!ћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фћР!фкР!ђкР!ђћР!фћР!фкР!ђЙР!фЙР!фкР!ђ ˜ў 4џџh. 8˜ў 4џhЗ!"#$CDRЯалщъїјOPРСOPefghj€Ÿ ЁЂ–™›ўР!фўР!фўР!ўР!фўР!фњР!фўР!фўР!фњР!фўР!фўР!ўР!фўР!фўР!фњР!фњР!фњР!фњР!фњР!фўР!фўР!фўР!фўР!фїѕўѓўўўР!фўўўўўа#K@ёџNormala .@. Heading 1 №< U]ck"A@ђџЁ"Default Paragraph Font @ђ Header рР! @ Footer рР!)@Ђ Page Number, to Steve Roscoe at and 11seach ESPs will forward a consolidated copy of their action lists to Steve Roscoe at the Energy Division by the January deadline. 22 2 2 2nown Sue SponselPacific Gas & ElectricFXB1@MGMT@DCPP Consultant2William KlenckManfXgjky”•–—˜™š›œžїюхмгBEFС›;ІPaBEFЖ›;ІPaBEFЕ›;ІPaAEFД›;ІPaBEFД›;ІPaWЂџџџџ!џџ џџЗ Wš: Љ т WР!фР!фР!ф69Xž " зUnknown Sue SponselPacific Gas & ElectricFXB1@MGMT@DCPP Consultant2William KlenckManfred MeisterLaura L. Johns Mike White Mark DoukasMANAGER - INTERNAL AUDITING Lawrence Abel Lawrence Abel Mike White…ё*› A Valued Microsoft Customer Valerie Lewis /A Valued Microsoft Customer Valerie LewisFUAlbert D. SmullinJanet L. Redmond-Sue SponselA Valued Microsoft Customer†;#З-Sue SponselA Valued Microsoft Customer†;#И')039џ•Œ!џ•€6 : = A ч ы r v Ь д XЦA Valued Microsoft CustomerE\\GO250\SJS3$\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docA Valued Microsoft CustomerE\\GO250\SJS3$\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docA Valued Microsoft CustomerE\\GO250\SJS3$\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docA Valued Microsoft CustomerE\\GO250\SJS3$\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docA Valued Microsoft CustomerE\\GO250\SJS3$\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docA Valued Microsoft CustomerE\\GO250\SJS3$\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.doc Dan BarberGC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docA Valued Microsoft CustomerGC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docA Valued Microsoft CustomerGC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.doc Sue SponselPC:\DATA\WINWORD\DA Stuff\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docџ@HP LaserJet 6P/6MP - EnhancedLPT1:HPBXLAHP LaserJet 6P/6MP - EnhancedHP LaserJet 6P/6MP - EnhancedD”Јіјќџ)Щѓ™.ЃџXјі‡ЏАБЕ)HP LaserJet 6P/6MP - EnhancedD”Јіјќџ)Щѓ™.ЃџXјі‡ЏАБЕ)€г г г г ABEFHa№: o p ~ € ‚ ƒ ’ м н ы я № % ) . q | ƒ „ … В erGC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.doc Sue SponselPC:\DATA\WINWORD\DA Stuff\Interim Proposal for Metering Requirement Threshold.docџ@HP LaserJet 6P/6MP - EnhancedLPT1:HPBXLAHP LaserJet 6P/6MP - EnhancedHP LaserJet 6P/6MP - EnhancedD”Јіјќџ)Щѓ™.ЃџXјі‡ЏАБЕ)HP LaserJet 6P/6MP - EnhancedD”Јіјќџ)Щѓ™.ЃџXјі‡ЏАБЕ)€г г г г ABEFHa№: o p ~ € ‚ ƒ ’ м н ы я № % ) . q | ƒ „ … В С Ф Х г ю я 456PQRSTUVW@AЛA№AёAіAјAњAћ@I AA— A A@І AAоAїAA"A)A*A+AXAgAjAkAyA”@:@ž@j@@€AAŸA—A@ž@Ÿ@ @Ё1Times New Roman Symbol &Arial"1ˆˆаhИ#;†Х›;ІЂ#;† ФФƒ!!f,Proposal for Metering Requirement ThreshholdA Valued Microsoft Customer Sue Sponsel)Щѓ™.ЃџXјі‡ЏАБЕ)€г г г г ABEFH№: o p ~ € ‚ ƒ ’ м н ы я № % ) . q | ƒ „ … В С Ф