Division of Ratepayer Advocates
Proposed Approach on Unbundling Issues


At the May 9, 1996, meeting of the Unbundling Working Group, the discussion resulted in the following preliminary issues:

Track 1Unresolved or Track 2
Generation Capacity & Energy
Generation Ancillary Services
Generation CTC
Transmission/ISO
Distribution/Customer Access
Public Benefits Programs
Billing
Metering
Customer Service & Support
Complaint Resolution
Hookups
Line Extensions
Power Quality
Prepayment of CTC
Parties were invited to develop position papers for discussion at the May 29 working group meeting, concerning the following: In general, DRA believes that priority should be placed on those items that are essential before the Commission can proceed with unbundling, i.e., critical path items. To do otherwise would jeopardize the orderly implementation of electric restructuring, with results that could be worse for ratepayers than any that would otherwise occur. DRA believes the critical path items are those that have already been identified as "Track 1", with any additional unbundling efforts being placed on billing and metering. As for methodology, DRA recommends using already-adopted methods as far as possible, with evolution of those methodologies being allowed to proceed as it traditionally does from case to case, and with resolution of differences in methodology between utilities being a part of that traditional evolution. DRA's identification of methodologies is preliminary at this time, with the next steps to be taken by the group being refinement of the methodological details; indeed, this position paper stops short of recommending specific approaches on some issue areas, and can only identify details that must be further explored. The need to resolve such details is among the reasons why DRA recommends limiting our commitments to pricing new competitive services.

Track 1 Issues

Track 2 Issues

Among the "Unresolved or Track 2" issues, the highest priority should be placed on billing and metering. Cost studies for these items should rely on recorded, historical data. With a target date of January 1998, we should use an avoided cost, i.e., decremental, approach where customers who do not receive billing and/or metering services from the UDC receive rate reductions in the amount of cost that the UDC can avoid through allowing aggregators to perform these functions. Through this approach, we have the greatest chance of successful implementation by January 1998, and avoid the possibility of creating additional stranded costs for billing and metering. As more refined cost studies can be performed, we should use marginal costs or market information to set rates for these services at more competitive levels.

DRA remains open to working with parties on further unbundling as expeditiously as possible, but believes that commitments should not be made to their completion by January 1998.