Re: Proposed language for on-site interrogation & data retrieval -Reply

Looks good to me.  Conrad, at FirstPoint

>>> <jep@primeu.cpuc.ca.gov> 04/12/98 01:51pm >>>
Tim and Young,

Sounds good. I would suggest 35 days in keeping with the
current Interim
Standards are utility billing cycles.

Chris

At 11:18 AM 4/7/98 PDT,
DMN5%Fsv%Csv@bangate.pge.com wrote:
>PSWG Plenary,
>
>Below is the proposed language for on-site interrogation &
data retrieval as 
>assigned to Tim in the last PSWG Plenary meeting on
4/1/98:
> 
>"A meter used in Direct Access shall display the total
KWH energy
consumption 
>as a minimum.  If a meter or meter device is capable of
storing load profile 
>billing data in its memory for a period of a minimum of xx
days (any period, 
>7 days, 15 days, or 30 days?), it must have an optical port
or another 
>physical communication connection for on-site
interrogation and load profile 
>data retrieval."
>
>Tim Vahlstrom and Young Nguyen
>PG&E
>
>
>



.