Re: Proposed language for on-site interrogation & data retrieval

Subject: Re: Proposed language for on-site interrogation & data retrieval
From: Chris King <chrisk@cellnet.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 14:51:34 -0700
In-Reply-To: <vines.Uwb7+Gsa8pA@go50.comp.pge.com>

Tim and Young,

Sounds good. I would suggest 35 days in keeping with the current Interim
Standards are utility billing cycles.

Chris

At 11:18 AM 4/7/98 PDT, DMN5%Fsv%Csv@bangate.pge.com wrote:
>PSWG Plenary,
>
>Below is the proposed language for on-site interrogation & data retrieval as 
>assigned to Tim in the last PSWG Plenary meeting on 4/1/98:
> 
>"A meter used in Direct Access shall display the total KWH energy
consumption 
>as a minimum.  If a meter or meter device is capable of storing load profile 
>billing data in its memory for a period of a minimum of xx days (any period, 
>7 days, 15 days, or 30 days?), it must have an optical port or another 
>physical communication connection for on-site interrogation and load profile 
>data retrieval."
>
>Tim Vahlstrom and Young Nguyen
>PG&E
>
>
>


.

References:

Proposed language for on-site interrogation & data retrieval

From: DMN5%Fsv%Csv@bangate.pge.com