Repost with attachment: Meter Equipment - Draft #3 of Certificat ion Testing Requirements

 <<331drf3.doc>> 
Sorry! I repost this email with attachment... 

Young Nguyen
PG&E

> ----------
> From: 	Nguyen, Young
> Sent: 	Monday, May 11, 1998 4:15 PM
> To: 	'pswg@dra1.cpuc.ca.gov'; 'pswg1web@dra1.cpuc.ca.gov';
> 'pswgweb@dra1.cpuc.ca.gov'
> Cc: 	'ron.d.pate@USTRA.mail.abb.com';
> 'pat.m.corrigan@ustra.mail.abb.com'; 'lauren.pananen@pacificorp.com';
> Vahlstrom, Timothy; Stacey, Kirsten; 'jpatters@energy.state.ca.us'
> Subject: 	Meter Equipment - Draft #3 of Certification Testing
> Requirements
> 
> Meter Equipment Subgroup,
> 
> Attached is the Word 6.0 file of the draft #3 Meter Equipment document
> which includes the changes (revision marks) of what the group discussed
> and agreed on in the last meeting.
> 
> After Tim and I sent it to our sub-team members for review,  Pat Corrigan
> of ABB called Young Nguyen to indicate that ABB has comments on the
> following three items:
> 
> Section II.2.2. - revise a wording from "measurement" to "billing
> determinants" in the second sentence.
> 
> Section II.3.1 - in Table II.3.1.a, move the vertical bar to the right by
> 1 to increase the allowable failures by one.  This may require some
> discussions and voting by the ME Group.
> 
> Section II.5 and II.6 - Need clarifications in the last paragraph of each
> Section.  This will be discussed in the coming up meeting to clarify it.
> 
> 
> Tim Vahlstrom and Young Nguyen
> PG&E
> ----------
> From: 	Nguyen, Young
> Sent: 	Thursday, April 30, 1998 5:50 PM
> To: 	'ron.d.pate@ustra.mail.abb.com';
> 'pat.m.corrigan@ustra.mail.abb.com'; 'lauren.pananen@pacificorp.com'
> Cc: 	Vahlstrom, Timothy; Stacey, Kirsten
> Subject: 	3rd draft of the Bob Lane's  Appendix B
> 
> Pat
> Lauren
> 
> Attached is the revised file according to what the PSWG discussed and
> agreed to in the meeting.  The revision marks show the changes.  As you
> may notice, I kept the last sentence of Sections II.1.5 so that it covers
> the production meters selected for certification testing, which I hope
> that you would not have a problem with.  Sections II.1.6 and II.2.2. have
> been revised to cover what we have discussed and hopefully agreed to in
> the meeting.  
> 
> The rest I either deleted or kept them as agreed.
> 
> Let me know if you would like to discuss this.  If you think some minor
> changes can be done via email, let's do so...
> 
> Tim & Young 
> PG&E
> 415-973-1686
> 
> 
>

331drf3.doc