Comment on 4-15 Meeting Notes

• Subject: Comment on 4-15 Meeting Notes
• From: Chris King <chrisk@cellnet.com>
• Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 17:59:32 -0700
• In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19980408052709.0068d680@alterdial.uu.net>

Michele,

In your notes, Item 11 says:

11. Applied Metering Technologies will revise II.E.9 with a look at using
+/-0.05%.

What is the reason for looking at using a standard so stringent in
comparison with the figure the Joint Parties already agreed to? (ten times
more stringent) If there is a valid market need, then we support it by all
means. Otherwise, a more stringent standard will certainly add costs, so we
need to understand the benefits. In short, we are against a more stringent
standard unless it can be shown that the benefits outweigh the costs.

Chris

At 05:27 AM 4/8/98 -0700, Michele Wynne wrote:
>Attached is draft version 2 of Sections 1 and 2 of the Metering
>Installation... information that will be used as the basis for drafting our
>report. 
>
>Send either send me (mwynne@uoc.com), the web exploder, or the Group 4 web
>site, any comments, additions or corrections by close of business Friday,
>April 10. A revised version, if needed, will be posted on Monday, April 13. 
>
>Michele Wynne
>Attachment Converted: "C:\EUDORA\Attach\G412-2.doc"
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\EUDORA\Attach\G412-2.rtf"
>


.

• No Subject
• From: Michele Wynne <mwynne@uoc.com>

• Prev: RE: Comment on 4-15 Meeting Notes
• Next: PSWG Subgroup April 15 Meeting Summary
• Main Index